Juan Powerblow;208661 said:...
If there's one fundamental conclusion I can derive, it is this... the E90 is a phenomenal quantum leap from the E46! It didn't seem so with short test drives I took previously but after 3 weeks of "ownership" and getting really acquianted with the E90, I think E46 owners who upgrade to the E90 would wished they did this sooner!
energy;209045 said:Are you sure Juan Powerblow? You are making me rethink of my RX8 and Civic 2.0 decision in Spore (I am currently hunting for a RX8 in Spore and may consider a Civic if delivery time is shortened). I understand that the Body-in-white and chassis of the E90 are similiar to the E46. That was one of the reasons I am not crazy about about the E90. Perhaps BMW have made improvements to the powertrain.
regards,
energy
E46Fanatic;209074 said:So what are the common things to look out for in running and maintaining the E90?
1) Engine oil level top ups
2) Active steering sensor
3) Flywheel oil seal
4) Door creaks
Anything else which commonly goes wrong with the E90?
Devilkl;209018 said:Hi,, I had my 1st 10,000km service 2 mths ago, and I need to top up engine oil at 12,000km as indicated..then at 14,500km..I top up another 1little engine oil again..is this normal?? I have a E90 ,325i...
Juan Powerblow;208661 said:!
There was one gripe though and that's engine noise! At high speeds, the N.V.H. seemed fallable and the engine noise just a bit too much. I'm not sure if it would have been better with newer tyres, the CSC2 on my car is already pretty worn out.
Today, I experienced one of Malaysia's notorious super thunderstorms on the NKVE and again, I was mightily impressed by the E90's composure, doddling at about 80 kmh seemed easy relative to a new E-Class and the recently older model S-Class which had to give way!
If there's one fundamental conclusion I can derive, it is this... the E90 is a phenomenal quantum leap from the E46! It didn't seem so with short test drives I took previously but after 3 weeks of "ownership" and getting really acquianted with the E90, I think E46 owners who upgrade to the E90 would wished they did this sooner!
Juan Powerblow;209084 said:Eh E46F, as I recall, didn't we have the same problem with our E46s when it was new? I remember I used to check oil levels every week. There was no leak but we had to do quite a bit of top-ups between oil services in the first year?
ALBundy;209088 said:Good to hear that you are having a blast with the E90.
As you have mentioned, a short drive wouldnt do justice to the car. After having spent 10 days driving it, I would say its a quantum leap over the e46 in terms of driving dynamics and creature comforts. AS for the NVH, I believe its the worn out RFTs, I took the car to the KLIA highway as well (and the tires were pretty worn as well) and the noise was quite audible. Later on a separate trip with some new Bridgestone Potenza, the noise was no longer audible.
I think the E90 325 M sport would be better in terms of driving dynamics with the M suspension. As it is, the handling is awesome.
energy;209141 said:I think RX8's consumption is similiar to our old E46 325i. Anyway, I have a few Sporean friends who has installed the '3/4 tank solution' in some Johor Bahru car accessories shop, which can be activated via remote control
David Yong;209172 said:For those who have not switch their RFT out from their car back to normal tyres..... I strongly advise you to do so.
I have switch the RFT on my e90 325i and I can tell you.... it's superb! The ride is not harsh at all. The comfort is very much improved! Better performance too as RFT are heavier than normal tyres. I have switch from 17" RFT to 18" Michelin Pilot Sport 2 (PS2) and.... wow....... wow..... so good!