tkew;245853 said:
You just started the party why go home so early ? Just answer the question ?
1)Who authorised the web hoster to shut down the server, when knowingly the downloading is in progress ??
This question will tell the whole story that claimed "hand over" is done .
2)Who shut down the server way before the web hoster saying that they will shut it down due to expiry of the contract ??
Web hoster normally allow a grace period to back up or transfer of data.
:thefinger:
Sorry, I am a bit confused here.
1. What proof do you have when you claim that the web hoster shutdown the server? As far as I know, most servers are usually located oversea other than the one operated by timedotcom, maxis and tmnet etc. Most servers provider lease "gigabytes space" to web hosting company which in turn sublease to people who want to host a website eg.. bmwcm forum. So if the server is shutdown as claimed, then other domians sharing the same server would be also affected. I don't think it make sense for a webhoster to do this type shutdown nor they have the power to do it unless the server is located in their office.
2. Yes, webhoster usually allowed grace period after the expiry of the contract but it is not very long.. Looking at the date from 11th till 16th, the website is still running and all data are intact after the admin key have been handed over on the 10th. That means a grace period of 6 days have been given. As mentioned by python, it usually take about 4 hours to zip backup all the files in his server harddisk and that include all the domains under his webhosting company. So a 6 days period is considered reasonable to download the files of 1 domain for backup purposes.
The scenario as I read it is:-
Tenant A of 9 family members rent a unfurnished bungalow except for a few fittings from Landlord A for a year. Tenant A invites friends to house warming party at bungalow. Friends of course come for party but bring some furniture to the bungalow knowing that the Tenant A have only rented an unfurnised bungalow. After party, friend leave behind some furniture as a gift.
Tenant A found another better bungalow (maybe nearer to working place) from Landlord B. Tenant A of course informed Lanlord A that he is going to move out before the 1 year period. Landlord A then asked Tenant A "What about the furnitures in the bangalow". Tenant A then said "No problem, my new lanlord B will take care of the moving. I am going for a holiday, could you pass the house key to the new lanlord B"
Landlord then say "OK lar" but informed Tenant A that the furniture must be moved by 1 month.
After 2 weeks later, lanlord A sent 3rd reminder via email messages that the furniture is still in the bungalow and Lanlord B have not moved it. Landlord A also remind tenant A that he have left 10 days to move out his furniture.
After 10 days later (3 days before the dateline), tenant A confirm the house key is received and Landlord B will be moving the furniture ASAP. Landlord B proceed to move the furniture but somewhere along the route, the furniture got hijacked or lost during the transportation. Tenant A was informed by Landlord B that they could not deliver the furniture because it was lost somehwere (but don't know where).
Tenant A got angry because he valued the furniture as it was a gift from friends. Tenant A contact landlord A and said "what have you done with my furniture? Why my landlord B cannot find it? and ""also why you stop my new Landlord B from entering the Bangalow to remove the furniture""
Landlord A say "OK I check for you and report back he can still see the furniture lying there in the bungalow via his remote camera"
However, 3 days after the expiry of the lease, a tsunami strike at the bungalow and all the furniture were swept away... sad..