Traveler
Official Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2007
- Messages
- 672
- Points
- 0
A roadtrip brought me these numbers (measured over a distance of 310-320km each):
1. Average speed 118km/h (crusing 120-130km/h, peak 145km/h) -> 12.3km/L
2. Average speed 108km/h (crusing 100-140km/h, peak 160km/h) -> 12.1km/L
At first glance it may appear higher speed -> better FC but I suspect the higher FC of #2 was due to a lot more acceleration/deceleration due to heavy traffic and rain. Unfortunately I didn't record down FC data from my previous trip over the same stretch using normal Shell RON97. Anyone have comparable numbers from using normal RON97?
Power-wise, did not notice any significant difference from my previous long-distance roadtrips on Shell RON97 and Petronas, but then I did minimal hard acceleration.
1. Average speed 118km/h (crusing 120-130km/h, peak 145km/h) -> 12.3km/L
2. Average speed 108km/h (crusing 100-140km/h, peak 160km/h) -> 12.1km/L
At first glance it may appear higher speed -> better FC but I suspect the higher FC of #2 was due to a lot more acceleration/deceleration due to heavy traffic and rain. Unfortunately I didn't record down FC data from my previous trip over the same stretch using normal Shell RON97. Anyone have comparable numbers from using normal RON97?
Power-wise, did not notice any significant difference from my previous long-distance roadtrips on Shell RON97 and Petronas, but then I did minimal hard acceleration.