Torque and Power

  • Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form

skar19

Retired
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
2,667
Points
38
found this on the netTorque and powerWhat is the difference between torque and power? The unit for torque is Nm, and the unit for power is horsepower or kiloWatt). We know that engines have it, but what is it?Imagine a bicycle. You are going uphill in the top gear. You will probably not even manage to get going from a standing start. If you are a fully-grown man with the feet locked into the pedals, you will produce about as much torque as a BMW V8 engine, around 400 Nm. That is an indication of the force you apply to the crank. It can be compared to how an engine pushes on its crankshaft with its pistons.How much power do you put out, then? The answer is zero! You can't have power as long as you don't get the bike moving. Your weight is one tenth of a ton, and the car could be two tons. What is it doing differently since it accelerates so well? You have the same torque, but you are stuck.The secret is the gear ratio. If you pick a lower gear, you will get up to speed too. If you have a mountain bike, you will notice that you can hardly get past walking pace in first gear. With such a low gear, you produce a lot of torque on the rear wheel. The same thing goes for cars. Even though it has 400 Nm at the flywheel, it has something like 6000 Nm on the driven wheels in first gear. The torque is multiplied in the transmission. First it is multiplied with approximately four in the gearbox, then something similar in the differential. (Yes, these are the numbers from the specs, like 3.73:1)In the top gears the torque is a lot lower, as the fifth gear doesn't increase the torque at all. That could leave you with only 1500 Nm on the driven wheels. If we had that low gears on the bicycle, we would be spinning the crank around without getting anywhere. On the bike you have approximately 400 Nm on the rear wheel in first gear, and then it gets less and less in the higher gears. You are perhaps left with 100 Nm in the top gear. In addition to that, the diameter of the rear wheel is larger. That will reduce the forward thrust even further. (Torque is force times arm length, and when the arm is long, the force gets weaker.)So how can the car cope with those low gears? The answer is high RPM. The pistons in an engine are pumping a lot quicker on the crankshaft than we can dream of doing on the pedals of a bicycle. When we are spinning the crank around as fast as we can, we are hardly keeping up with the pedals. The force is close to zero. That is the torque. We produce a lot of torque at standstill, but it drops off badly the faster we are pushing the pedals around. At one point the torque equals zero, and we reach our limit.The torque produced by an engine will actually increase with RPM up until a point. On BMWs this is usually around 4000 RPM. Then the torque will drop off gradually until the engine runs into the limiter, where the torque is zero. An engine will produce the same torque when pumping the crankshaft around at an insane rate as we do at standstill. This is where the power comes in, to express this difference. Power equals force times speed. If we are talking about a rotational motion, power equals torque times rotational speed (RPM). That power is what pushes a car forwards. The faster you can push the pedals around with the same force, the lower gears you can use. This is where the engine is so much better than us, and that is why it will beat us in a quarter mile race. The torque peak is the same, but the RPM is a lot higher. The product of these is power, and that is a good indicator of performance. The torque peak doesn't really say much about the performance potential. If it is achieved at a very low RPM, it can't use low gears. A BMW 320d has a lot more torque than a Honda S2000, but the Honda engine will make the car a lot quicker. The reason is that it has the torque peak at a very high RPM, so it can go fast in the low gears. That does of course make it very strong. The power reflects it too, as the Honda indeed has more power than the 320d. Since the torque on the driven wheels pushes the car forwards, you get the best acceleration by picking the lowest gear possible. That will multiply the torque more than higher gears would. As a biker you can risk getting too high RPM so that you have no more force left on the pedals. To get the optimum acceleration, you should change to a higher gear when the power there is the same as in the current gear. The RPM will drop, but the torque will be increase (since we, like electric motors, are stronger at low RPM). The peak power of a well-trained bicycle rider is approximately one horsepower at 90 RPM, and it is the same in all gears. The torque on the rear wheel does however vary a lot from gear to gear. Modern Car engines will produce so much torque at high RPM that you don't have to change up to the next gear until you run into the rev limiter. Not until that point does the torque drop enough to counter the RPM change to the next gear. Those who have seen Ketill "Varvtalsmatadoren" Jacobsen drive his BMW M518i have seen this principle implemented. He knows that when he changes up one gear, he will not get as much help from the gearbox multiplication as he does in the current gear. That is why he is so reluctant to change up.Ove Kvam
 
Great. Been wondering about the diff between Torque and BHP.

But still a little cuntfused after reading the article. maybe that's I didn't do well in school.... :blush: :blush:

Will try again later. :eek:k:
 
Simplest way to view it is :

Torque gives you acceleration. Horsepower gives you top-speed.

The gear cogs and diffs are just multipliers to allow/disallow good acceleration and achieving the required topspeed. If you ain't got the HP, you cannot achieve the rated top speed. Since your aerodynamic drag is so strong that your forward pushing torque+hp is LESS than drag!. ie . Terminal velocity!.

You can see that very old boxy cars and trucks can hardly go past 120 Kph, since the drag is too much for the puny engines to over-come.

But then, if you look at SuperCars like McLaren F1 or Porsche Garrera GT, they have a different problem where the aero will need to push the car down to stay on the road, or else it will be air borne!.
Just compare, a small light plane takes off about 60-70 mph, while a 747 needs 140-150mph for take off speed. Of course their wings assist them do it. Getting past 190 mph for a car is a very very difficult engineering task to overcome. I doubt if the McLaren test driver did not consider he could die when he hit the 241mph (thats 385 kph!!!) world record speed!. Scary.
 
Another illustration of torque is when you are screwing. If you use a longer wrench, you actually multiple the torque produced because of the length. Similar principle why longer stroke engines have higher torque (328 vs 325) even with the same bore and rpm. :D
 
:lol: :p :rofl: :eek:k:

bundy,i prefer ur explaination better!easier to remember and comprehend tht way! :nyehehe:
 
i ll agree that the article is a bit technical.....bundy well said..
 
Originally posted by tyke@Jun 15 2005, 04:24 PM
easier to remember and comprehend tht way! :nyehehe:
You mean you can cum-prehend better to solve your cunt-fusion? :p
 
Originally posted by ALBundy@Jun 15 2005, 03:20 AM
Another illustration of torque is when you are screwing. If you use a longer wrench, you actually multiple the torque produced because of the length. Similar principle why longer stroke engines have higher torque (328 vs 325) even with the same bore and rpm. :D
i dont' think you can compare displacement vs longer stroke engine.

It should be compared with the same engine size... because larger engine for the same technology should give bigger torque anyway, unless other parameters are changed eg inlet manifold, exhaust headers, custom piston, knife edge crank, lightened rocker arm, valves, improve VE etc which change the characteristic of the same engine.

BTW the bore size can give a better torque as well, and that's why larger/heavier car will have larger cylinder diameters.

although the illustration clears the confusion, a longer stroke engine should give bigger torque than shorter one of the same engine size.


just a 2 seng...
 
i think the best comparison is the 2.5 e and 2.5i based engine

the i engine has 84 bore and 75 stroke
e engine has 84 bore and 81 stroke

imo if ur able to increase the stroke further, u will get an increase in torque. but even with the above coomparison, the internals are still different ie piston shape flat vs dome , head design..etc ..etc...
 
The reason I mentioned about the different models and hence different displacement (as a result of the longer stroke) is to further highlight the difference between torque and hp.

Basically the 2.5 and 2.8 engine has the same bore which is 84mm and the difference in stroke is 3mm (81mm vs 84mm). The extra capacity (less than 300cc) comes from this extra stroke which resulted in 10% increase in torque but only a puny 1hp increase (0.005%)! Similarly the 4.0 and 4.4 engine has the same bore but longer stroke in the latter engine which see the 4.4 engine has 10% more torque but producing the same hp! So back to what you said, "bigger engines should have more torque"...this is due to the longer stroke as I mentioned before.

Of course when an engine is overbore, the torque would increase as well, provided the compression ratio is increase (combustion chamber volume has increased), fuel supply is increase and etc...basically back to the wrench example, you are increasing the FORCE applied. But if you study carefully, increasing the length of the wrench is the easiest way (cheapest as well) to increase torque without having to apply more force at the end of the wrench (lagi penat and peluh hehe).

Which precisely is what BMW is doing to most of their engines :)
 
Originally posted by ALBundy@Jun 15 2005, 08:35 PM

Basically the 2.5 and 2.8 engine has the same bore which is 84mm and the difference in stroke is 3mm (81mm vs 84mm). The extra capacity (less than 300cc) comes from this extra stroke which resulted in 10% increase in torque but only a puny 1hp increase (0.005%)! Similarly the 4.0 and 4.4 engine has the same bore but longer stroke in the latter engine which see the 4.4 engine has 10% more torque but producing the same hp! So back to what you said, "bigger engines should have more torque"...this is due to the longer stroke as I mentioned before.

Of course when an engine is overbore, the torque would increase as well, provided the compression ratio is increase (combustion chamber volume has increased), fuel supply is increase and etc...basically back to the wrench example, you are increasing the FORCE applied. But if you study carefully, increasing the length of the wrench is the easiest way (cheapest as well) to increase torque without having to apply more force at the end of the wrench (lagi penat and peluh hehe).

Which precisely is what BMW is doing to most of their engines :)
BTW there's side effect of longer stroke against the HP, as this will reduce happy revving comparatively, since HP is ratio of rpm. And perhaps that's the reason for the puny 1 hp increase.

But a monster V12 5.0L has only 75mm stroke per cylinder with same bore. But in this case displacement gives the torque impact but shorther stroke means it's a hi revving engine, you'd probably almost wont feel it.

Or compare between earlier perdana 4 cyl 2.0L vs later V6 2.0L which has longer stroke?

Perhaps a 3.0L (is it?) F1 engine comes with 10 cylinder, to balance between torque revving-ability (shorter stroke relatively) and high torque etc etc.

But as technology progresses, eg a 3.0L M30 (Str 6) vs 3.0L M60 (V8) vs 3.0L M5x (Str 6-DOHC and vanos-for torque/HP improvement) will give us different view to the basic formula.

This is also similar to other creativity like VVTI, VTEC and campro(???), or 8valve, 12V, 16V, single cam, dual cam, single spark, dual spark..... and technology from audi, porche, VW as well super bikes of the oldies and the new schools...
 
Yup, agreed that there is a limit of how much the manufacturer should stroke the engine. Even with a 3mm difference, I can feel the 2.5 engine is more free revving :D The 2.8 engine "seemed" more lazy actually :nyehehe:
 
Necc, sure you are not one of those chaps who flung their engineering foundation year program and later joined the business college?? :D :D (btw its a compliment)!!

Yeah its related..here is the formula, HP=(RPM*Torque)/5252

Its related but not the same. And from the formula, at 5252 rpm the engine is producing the same amount of torque and hp.
 
Also, not to forget that the more cylinders, the more torque. Thats becuase the angle of "kick" to the crankshaft is more for more cylinders. 4vs 6vs 8vs 10 vs 12. The BMW 6 banger is almost a perfect design up to 3.8 litres. Above that V8 or more takes over.

Europeans live on torque (eg Benz) but japanese live on HP cos to them HP on paper sells!. Its a marketing thing. As someone said linearity is best for both torque and HP.

Our racing instructor said E30M3's S14 engine in race trim is linear in both HP and torque. That mated to a close ratio 5 speed give very usable hp/torque for most track conditions allowing 90% use of available HP for most tracks. Serious race guys had gears that swing 500 rpm only unlike regular cars that varies from 2500 rpm to 3500 rpm. If you see WRC, they keep the rpm at peak or near peak all the time 500-800 rpm below redline. Thats their powerband.

Latest EVO Phil magaizine had M6 doing hard driving in Germany. It runs 200KM only on a full tank!. Thats 7 mpg!!!. Heavy drinker. Alright.
 
In terms of engine design in relation to the optimum number of cylinders, it was mentioned is some technical papers, the holy grail is the V10 design, currently employed by F1 engines. To a lesser degree the inline 5 cylinder design is also as good. I have had a Honda Vigor that uses a 5 cylinder 20 valve configuration and it was silky smooth :)
 
Originally posted by ALBundy@Jun 16 2005, 05:23 PM
Necc, sure you are not one of those chaps who flung their engineering foundation year program and later joined the business college?? :D :D (btw its a compliment)!!

Yeah its related..here is the formula, HP=(RPM*Torque)/5252

Its related but not the same. And from the formula, at 5252 rpm the engine is producing the same amount of torque and hp.
I take the formula with pinch of salt.

if the formula is really correct, then can prove using dyno chart.
 
Aiya, you should know better, results from a dyno test varies from one place to another. But looking at my dyno graph, the results looked pretty close to the formula.
 
based on the formula, assuming u got a flat torque curve, then the HP will go up steadily across the RPM range.

but will the formula still work for engine with high torque but low horsepower. like those American V8s and the BMW eta engines?
 
Top Bottom