t2ribena;838436 said:did a test with ron97 then add in a 10point octane booster...suppose to be RON98 but the test return RON97.1 which is the original RON...I stop using any booster since...
Eh ... How u test it la? Interesting ...
t2ribena;838436 said:did a test with ron97 then add in a 10point octane booster...suppose to be RON98 but the test return RON97.1 which is the original RON...I stop using any booster since...
siva93;838434 said:It's because a lot of talks that is why i am curious to try it out myself bro. haaha Googled it i think a couple of months back. So I really want to test and see if it has good mileage or not. But only thing I must finish the petrol first. Pour RON97 with the octane boosters.
Well I am not sure but probably true also tianci maybe psychological also.
Eh btw guys I heard RON 91 coming in??? Is it confirm or is this rumor fake as well?
tIANcI;838490 said:For a car like 3 series of about 1,400-1,500 kgs, we need at least say 25+HP before we can feel anything la. I tried RON97 in my e90 325, din feel anything. Tried in my CRZ also feel nothing. I wish the N52B25 was a tougher engine, then can do something about it to kick out another 30+HP but a remap can only give you about 18HP at best. That is hardly anything for a remap fee of 3K.
tIANcI;838489 said:Eh ... How u test it la? Interesting ...
t2ribena;838564 said:the diff when using ron95 and ron97 is too mininal to notice when used on engine with compression ratio up to 10:1...mostly its psychological due to the price paid...kekeke
you will definately feel the diff if the compression ratio starts from 12:1 (NA) and FI engines...
tIANcI;838490 said:For a car like 3 series of about 1,400-1,500 kgs, we need at least say 25+HP before we can feel anything la. I tried RON97 in my e90 325, din feel anything. Tried in my CRZ also feel nothing. I wish the N52B25 was a tougher engine, then can do something about it to kick out another 30+HP but a remap can only give you about 18HP at best. That is hardly anything for a remap fee of 3K.
kolamp;838653 said:Change to 3-stage intake laa bro can go up to 260bhp as I read in e90post....best bang for buck mods for N52b25 engine hehehee
tIANcI;838912 said:Kolamp ... If can safely get 260HP the the e90 will be a totally sweet DD la. For me that will be perfect as a DD. Extra 40HP, what a dream ...
Got the link ar? I did not see that at e90post.
kolamp;839129 said:http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=381371
Referring to above link,
This conversion would increase power to approximately 265hp and 225 lbft tq (stock 330i: 255/220) due to the ecu reprogramming to powerchip's performance tune (claimed at 275/233) minus the losses from a more restrictive exhaust system on the 25i/28i.
This modification allows 325s to achieve 50hp/40tq gains and 328s to achieve 35hp/25tq gains, rendering this upgrade the most cost effective for non-330 N52s.
It cost bout USD1K for all parts excl. tuning & DISA activation....I'm seriously considering doing this in near future....GB laa heheh
tIANcI;839151 said:Thanks for the link. Looks most tempting. GB huh? hehehehe
But is the US version not the N52B30?
t2ribena;838436 said:did a test with ron97 then add in a 10point octane booster...suppose to be RON98 but the test return RON97.1 which is the original RON...I stop using any booster since...
alantiong;839430 said:funny no one ask me about it this time...
tIANcI;839442 said:Why? Usually they always ask you one issit?
ALIAS;840809 said:In the US, Shell V Power is only 91-93 octane. That's supposedly the most premium fuel you can get. I don't know if the supercars need to have their timing retarded for the US market.
Our low end fuel here is 95 octane. Why do I want to pay RM1 extra per litre for RON97 when RON93 is good enough for supercars?
Check out the link here : http://www.shell.us/products-services/on-the-road/fuels/v-power/overview.html