BMW 325i vs Merc C250 CGI vs Audi A4 2.0TFSI Quattro vs Volkswagen Passat CC

  • Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form
Jonn;620145 said:
Morgan, I can completely understand your view of BMW and I totally agree, and I thought I will share my 2 cents about my experiences with some of the cars mentioned here. Maybe it will give you an insight into your interest in the GTi.

I have owned 2 Audi A4's, a B6 (2 generations back) and a B8 (the current model) and in between the 2 Audis, a E90 325. I am currently driving a Scirocco 2.0T.

Here's my take:-

325
- Engine sound trumps the other cars. The six is really sweet
- Handling trumps the A4's anyday

And honestly, that's all I think of that goes to the 3 because most everything else, it either loses out or is not much better.

Straight line performance - no match for the A4 2.0T nor the Scirocco. I echo what you mentioned about the Beemer being the ultimate driving machine that is slower than all its rivals. The 325 which competes with the A4 2.0T and the C250 does a measly 7.7 to 100kmh whilst the A4 does it in 6.5 and the C250 in the new facelift in 7.1. Bit embarassing for Beemer who is always considered to the most performance oriented amongst the 3 Germans

Handling - can't beat the go-kart feel of the Scirocco. True the 3 handles fast bends and corners well, don't understeer as much as the Scirocco and handles quick directional changes much better than the A4 (the A4 hates directional changes, one quick left and right and the car immediately feels very unsettled) but because the Scirocco handles like a gokart, changing directions back and forth multiple times is zero drama. No body rolls, no unsettled feeling... the car just feels like it's made to do that. Of course I have to qualify this and admit that it is not fair comparing the handling of a 4-door sports saloon to a 2-door coupe.

Interior - BMW looks only slightly better than the VW. Maybe because the interior has not really changed much since the E46 and I have grown tired of it but I find the A4 interior (the B8) so much better, from the nicely placed colored screen in the middle dash, the speedo clarity, the air cond controls

Ride - I actually find the Scirocco which I will termed as "hard ride" to be better than the 3. True the 3 handles well and you have to sacrifice some ride comfort for that but to me, the sacrifice is too much. Again, this is subjective but to me, on days when I just want to sedately drive home after a long day at work... the 325's ride does get on my nerves. A lot of it could be due to the RFT and more than once I have had people telling me if I swap them out for normal tyres, it'll be much improved. But hey, if I had to spend a few more grand on top of what I've paid for to get the car so that I can get more comfort out of it... something must be wrong.

After Sales Service - AB service ain't bad but I won't say it is much better than Euromobil. In both companies, I will say the level of service you get is dependent on who serves you. Just that in AB, there are more of the better service attendants than Euromobil. But once you know who is good and you look for the same guy everytime you make an appointment, then the service level difference becomes minimal. What I have found equally annoying about both companies is that the servicing always takes a day. Go in for a scheduled engine oil change and it takes a full day. That is annoying for me. It takes only an hour to change the engine oil and do the checks that they do but both AB and Euromobil tells you it will take a day when you make an appointment.

Built quality - have to admit that the A4 beats the 3 hands down here. Maybe because the 3 is a CKD and the A4's are CBU. But in the time that I owned both A4 (3 years for the B6 and 2 years for the B8), I have not spent a single cent of repairs. Only thing I've spent on was regular service. On the B6, Euromobil had even changed the air-cond interface on the car citing that there was some problems with it which they had received a memo from Germany and that they are changing all B6's that are still under warranty. Mine had no problems but hey, if they were gonna give me a new interface, why not. As for my 325 (3 years ownership) I have had engine oil problems. Not leaking, but evaporating. The engine oil goes down so fast I had to top up almost every few thousand kms. This from brand new. After a few diagnosis, BMW told me that it is a problem with the engine block itself and they will have to change the entire block. All under warranty of course and they gave me a courtesy car, they went to JPJ to change the engine number on my reg card for me etc but still... how can a brand new car require an engine change. Also... it was a lot tougher to sell the car when the reg card showed an engine change... Have 2 other friends with E46, one had problems with her 320's engine butterfly valves (changed multiple times under warranty) and the other had problems with his 325's gearbox.

Depreciation - believe it or not, I have lost more on the 325 than on both A4's. I had expected to lose less on a Beemer than an Audi but not true.

As for the Scirocco, except for the car having cheaper accessories (lower end sound system, no bluetooth connectivity etc) and of course a less prestigious image compared to the BMW and Audi, the ownership experience is not much difference. The built quality is still very good (I have only had the car for 9 months so maybe it is too early to tell) and the drive and feel is still very German. Service is better in that they do segregate between people who go in for repairs/troubleshooting vs regular scheduled servicing. So to service my car and get an engine oil change, it takes 1 hour. I can actually wait there and seat around. For AB and Euromobil... I have never had a half day turnaround on servicing, let alone 1 hour.

So overall for me, although VW is very much a cheaper car and of course in Germany, is not used in the same breath as the Mercs, Beemers and Audis... but the ownership experience is on par with the other Germans... at least here in Malaysia.

For me the Scirocco is a mid-life crisis go-fast car that I bought to get it out of my system before I really get too old and look like an uncle driving his son's car :) so I never expected to keep it for long. Now that I've driven it for 9 months, I must say that the initial fun of tearing down the road and driving like a maniac has worn off. The impracticalities of a 2-door car, the bumpy ride etc is becoming more obvious. I will probably keep this car for no more than another 9 months to a year and go back to a proper 4-door sedan. Unless the new 2012 3-series really blow me away, I will most likely consider the C250 or the C300. With the new facelift and Merc finally replacing the stupid pop-up display with a proper built-in display, the 7-speed Gtronic now available on the C250 and the new aluminium bonnet that should shave weight and improve performance, it is starting to look more promising.

Jonn, great write up! The A4 really got the wow factor, but I get bored after some time. I agree with you.

I am a bit doubtful if you would like the C250's sterring, gas pedal, brake feel... I was really shock when I test drove it. Do find out!
 
E46Fanatic;620214 said:
Like Jonn I think I am going through MLC too. But not daring enuff to get a Roc as a daily driver :). Sold the 4 door E90. 325i and booked an A5 2.0TQ from EM (with 19' wheel option in my avatar and panoramic roof). Wanted red as well but chickened out last min amd booked white.

I was wondering when you would switch, as I knew you would. As soon as I saw the new avatar, I thought: "Oh..ohhh, he's DONE it!" :13:

But bro, let me tell you something about yourself. Far from a MLC, you're showing the inherent youth in you. Let's face it, the BMW aura has gotten more and more staid and uncley with each successive model. I can hardly believe that the 3 all started with the 2002, E21, E30. What a world apart that world was! On the other hand Audi have gone the opposite way, from staid and uncley, to the most exciting among German premiums now.

The A5...very nice...congrats! :top: But red would have taken it a bit too far for a CEO and family man. :4:
 
A5 indeed a very good choice. Red will be so striking. White suits you more my friend. Remember not to forget us here after jumping ship k :)
 
Not so much jumping ship la. More of "don't try, don't know". Bmw makes great cars and I am sure I'll still own more beemers in the future :).

I am not the first ex E90er in the forum to try an Audi. SimonKhw just bought a Q7 and Ken (330i) is currently shopping for an S4! Seems that this trend support stats that VAG is growing market share.
 
E46Fanatic;620214 said:
Like Jonn I think I am going through MLC too. But not daring enuff to get a Roc as a daily driver :). Sold the 4 door E90. 325i and booked an A5 2.0TQ from EM (with 19' wheel option in my avatar and panoramic roof). Wanted red as well but chickened out last min amd booked white. Car will only arrive in July tho.

The thing about the 2.0TQ is it makes so much torque early but tend to fizzle out at higher revs. Unlike the GTI or Roc whic makes less torque but it gradually builds up. So GTi and Rocs would be more satisfying to drive hard as it gives u that rush and sense of speed. However the A5 with a nice APR S3K04 kit should solve this lack of top end rush.

Congrats my friend! :) Let me know if you need a ride to collect the carin May. Would be glad to do so anytime.
 
supergripen;620203 said:
The e90's ride in Msport guise really does get on your nerves..

Jonn, excellent commentary! With regards to the ride, I have to disagree with Supergripen and Jonn, IMHO the E90 LCI MSport ride is rather acceptable. I thought it would be quite jarring at first, but when I got my car last year, driving it as my daily ride, it's pretty comfortable. My tires are 2010 3rd Generation RFTs.
 
+1. I'm also on 2010 3rd Gen RFTs, which are IMO superb. Also I knew what I was getting, as I tested the 325i and 325i Sports back-to-back in one session. The diff in comfort was marginal.
 
1 gen...rock hard, poor handling, exhorbitant
2 gen...hard, reasonable handling, expensive
3 gen...like normal tyres, good handling, value for money

Good enough, 3er? :4:
 
Schwepps;620872 said:
1 gen...rock hard, poor handling, exhorbitant
2 gen...hard, reasonable handling, expensive
3 gen...like normal tyres, good handling, value for money

Good enough, 3er? :4:

Very well laid out mate :)
 
M3ac;620782 said:
Jonn, excellent commentary! With regards to the ride, I have to disagree with Supergripen and Jonn, IMHO the E90 LCI MSport ride is rather acceptable. I thought it would be quite jarring at first, but when I got my car last year, driving it as my daily ride, it's pretty comfortable. My tires are 2010 3rd Generation RFTs.

I guess ride quality is something that different people measure differently.I tested the 320d Msport extensively(almost bought one) and liked the ride tremendously,but my 335's ride is very far removed from the 320d.I'm used to a wide variety of cars,from my Subaru Impreza STi sitting on fully adjustable race tuned suspension to the cossetting ride of my dad's S-class.So where do I put my 335's ride in the range? Just slightly better than the Subaru's.I can't comment on an LCI 325i Msport's ride cuz I 've only driven those on very short drives.I've driven an e92 M3 and that felt miles better than my 335.
Maybe it's just my car la.. dunno.But it will definitely get a set of KWs soon.These will make a marked improvement in all areas.
 
NO worries mate. The KW's would definitely help. E46fanatics had KW's on his ride or rather ex-ride. He will soon be a proud Audi owner :)

Anyway, you are welcome to check out my ride quality/feel anytime. Am running on stock 193 M Sport Star Spoke 18' staggered wheels ie:stock setup.
 
M3ac;620900 said:
NO worries mate. The KW's would definitely help. E46fanatics had KW's on his ride or rather ex-ride. He will soon be a proud Audi owner :)

Anyway, you are welcome to check out my ride quality/feel anytime. Am running on stock 193 M Sport Star Spoke 18' staggered wheels ie:stock setup.

dear all,

how does KW's perform compare to m-sport set up? Better in term of comfort? Am thinking to switch to non-RFT to improve comfort or replace with KW's and maintained RFT..

Thanks!
 
Totally agree about ride comfort being very individualistic, and subjective. Sometimes, it is also influenced by expectations vs reality as well as the expectations of the car e.g. the brand or model. I know it is true for me. When I first drove the current Honda Civic Type R, I remember commenting right after that it was like driving a little boat in a bad storm at sea. It as back breaking! But that's probably also influenced by the fact that it was a Honda Type R. In reality, it probably wasn't that different from a 335 which I was actually this close to getting prior to the Scirocco... but couldn't live with the hard ride.
 
Schwepps;620872 said:
1 gen...rock hard, poor handling, exhorbitant
2 gen...hard, reasonable handling, expensive
3 gen...like normal tyres, good handling, value for money

Good enough, 3er? :4:

Mine is on Potenza RE050A II , so means it's 2nd generation ?
 
AiRBooM;621246 said:
Mine is on Potenza RE050A II , so means it's 2nd generation ?

Try checking the tyre manufacture stamp. It's a four digit number, eg 1610 which means the tyre was manufactured on the 16th week (approx. in the month of April) of the year 2010. IIRC, 2010 tyres should be 3rd Gen....
 
M3ac;621292 said:
Try checking the tyre manufacture stamp. It's a four digit number, eg 1610 which means the tyre was manufactured on the 16th week (approx. in the month of April) of the year 2010. IIRC, 2010 tyres should be 3rd Gen....

Sorry bro, 3rd gen runflats are only arriving on the market now and are marketed as different models. The RE050 I/II/III are not 3rd gen runflats from what I know.

http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/showthread.php?t=529670
 
Schwepps;621411 said:
Bridgestone rolled out their 3G RFTs at the end of 2009, as did the other major manufacturers. Read the last 7 paras if you don't have the time to read the whole thing.

http://bridgestone.tiremedia.com/news/1895.html

I always read that Bridgestone announced their 3rd gen RFT at the end of 2009 but none were shipped. In fact, this notice from July 2010 stated that there's a delay.

http://www.event-tyres.co.uk/news/bridgestone-3g-rft-runflat-tyres-delayed-1012.php

Haven't really looked at RFTs recently though, I'm sure they're already available now that it's almost the second quarter of 2011.
 
Top Bottom