astroboy;598544 said:First thought is: "... fcuk! should have done it earlier!"
right?! :4:
herbert;598552 said:so you have been driving a "lorry" all these while (slightly more than 3 years)...
astroboy;598544 said:First thought is: "... fcuk! should have done it earlier!"
right?! :4:
AhTu;598570 said:Damn you are totally right!!!
You know, for the virgin drive I brought my wife for a ride. She told me she is inside a lorry!!!!:20:
haKKaMeE;598583 said:Hi AhTu
Mind sharing with us the cost...
wan_juara;598582 said:hi....i m new here. just introduce myself in the newbie thread.
i never ride in the rft before. is it that bad???
wan_juara;598582 said:hi....i m new here. just introduce myself in the newbie thread.
i never ride in the rft before. is it that bad???
haKKaMeE;598583 said:Hi AhTu
Mind sharing with us the cost...
wan_juara;598582 said:hi....i m new here. just introduce myself in the newbie thread.
i never ride in the rft before. is it that bad???
astroboy;598681 said:It's not that bad. Firstly, its low profile tyres, secondly, we are comparing it with Michelin PS3 soft rubber grippy performance tyre. That's why the gap is sky and earth. But if you compare with a regular cheapo, hard compound, durable, low rolling resistance, maximise fuel economy Teksi tyres, not much difference. So how bad is RFT? depending what you comparing with.. and the later generation of the RFT is softer liao, some say is near conventional tyre comfort.
My recent encounter, aquaplaned into a guard rail.. only RFT can survive:
thanks astroboy. i m using sc3 on my current ride, quite soft and comparable to ps3.
YHT;603442 said:Just replaced all 4 of my RFT to PS3 (225/45/17 @ RM575 each @ Sunway), also bought a Michelin 12VDC pump, just in case
My comment? Indeed, it is much softer than the RFT, less noise, slight performance increase during acceleration, good traction and grip on wet road surface, so far so good. The only thing worrying me now is the punture (if it ever occurred).