Originally posted by Daredevil@Jul 6 2006, 09:56 AM
Mr Pope,
You seem to be showing a great level of interest in the progress of the ROS. Any particular reason? And what elections are you talking about? care to enlighten us?
I think that we've been transparent enough thus far and your manner of pushing for a progress seems a little premature. When the committee say we're actively on it, it means we're actively on it. UNless you have some kind of special services to offer to facilitate the entire process, would appreciate you to be more patient and wait for the outcome.
Mr. Daredevil,
Your questions shall be answered consecutively so as to avoid deviation, if that's alright.
1. You seem to be showing a great level of interest in the progress of the ROS. Any particular reason
Answer: Yes. The "committee" has been heralding its "arrival" for a fair amount of time with alot of "promises" being made along the lines of "when we get the ROS blah blah blah". The cert from BMW AG was awarded 4 years ago (if i'm not mistaken) which means that the application should have been made at that point. Fine, it wasnt but it was done over a year ago. Kudos to the ppl who took on that task. However, it does not usually take over a year to get the ROS membership unless the application is not in order or the individuals making the application are of a dubious character. This is especially so when it involves an application that forms part of a Chapter/Branch of an International Society/club.
2. And what elections are you talking about?
Answer: My apologies. I was led to believe that the preset committee is elected. Since you have implied that this is not the case, is "new blood" thus invited to join by the existing committee? If that is the case, isnt this a contravention of the term "pro-tem committee" since it should be the "original committtee" that should be helming the "club" until ROS membership? Which means the original guys/gals who started the club should be the ones who are still "running the show" until ROS membership?
3. care to enlighten us?
Answer: refer to above.
4. I think that we've been transparent enough thus far and your manner of pushing for a progress seems a little premature.
Answer: Its been over a year.
5. UNless you have some kind of special services to offer to facilitate the entire process, would appreciate you to be more patient and wait for the outcome.
Answer: Will gladly chase the Kementrian Hal-Ehwal Dalam Negeri on the matter since my job entails dealing with them on a weekly basis. Care to hand over all documents and files? Will even provide updates on a weekly/fortnightly basis or whenever there's communication.
6. Note to AlBundy: ALBundy Posted on Jul 6 2006, 10:23 AM
Rumour has it, someone is itching to be in the committee.....campaigning already wor..
Answer: If you're going to take a swipe at anyone, grow up & put your money where your mouth is. Either say who it is, or stop with the innuendo. Its a waste of bandwith (since its not facilitating any intellectual discourse on the topic/thread) and not to mention schoolyard juvenile in nature.
Cheers!