Reply to thread

Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form

Message: <blockquote data-quote="loafer" data-source="post: 287425" data-attributes="member: 10508">So far the best quality I've seen is from Canon and Sony. I personally dislike anything Sony (except for their Playstations which I'm an avid supporter) due to their memory card type. Also try to find something that doesn't have the charger built-in together with the camera. It's costly to fix in the event the charger malfunctions and whatnot.Turbology basically summed up what you should look for in a digital camera, although I don't agree with point no.1 he he.My very first digital camera was a Casio Z4 which had a decent image quality but was horrible when you used flash. Somehow the flash and shutter doesn't seem to want to work together <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue    :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />. I think over the years Casio has improved themselves greatly and the picture quality from the newer models are great and comparable to brands like Canon and Sony.Film is still a great format to shoot on imo. Only problem is that you can't preview your shots like what you can do with digital cameras. A square format Hasselblad is wonderful if you can afford one. Only a small handful of people I know now still shoot on film.P.S (I stay away from anything that uses AA batteries <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue    :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />)</blockquote>

Verification