Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="popeadrian" data-source="post: 228419" data-attributes="member: 2065">Think you missed the point (AGAIN) in your analogy....  Firstly, as bmwcar's scenario rightly points out, FE stated that there were no outstanding monies due. Secondly, i think its mentioned somewhere but may have been edited....the scenario was such that the Member Hoster had via text messages said that his business partner in FE refuses to aid in the clean handover unless the Co.HT kow-towed to the business partner. Thirdly, using your analogy of moving from a dot com to a dot com dot my with the analogy of houses & furniture. Its quite simple.... since the house (ie dot com) is owned by one person, the furniture OBVIOUSLY belongs to another person, then this is a RENTAL. So, if the person wants to move house after a couple of months, obviously the furniture will go with the them, isnt it? You cant rent an empty house and then leave the furniture just because the person who made you the furniture is claiming that they still own the furnitre, isnt it? Then that furniture maker is either a liar or trying to be a thief. Or worse still, if the landlord of your new house is claiming that they put in some new furniture for you (and already charge you for it) but if you leave their property you must leave all your existing furniture for them!  Either way, the furniture maker or the landlord of the new house (using your analogy) is unethical.</blockquote>