Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NKTOB" data-source="post: 228389" data-attributes="member: 2762">In this case, FE services was &quot;TERMINATED&quot; even before the yearly contract was up, coz a new service provider was already appointed!&nbsp;What can/shd a &quot;TERMINATED&quot; service provider like FE to render some more?&nbsp;In short..&nbsp;Fraudulent Ent started out on a voluntarily basis, more for the passion &amp; friendship then anything else.&nbsp;However in a short span, the objectives have deviated from it&#039;s core. A newer approach was suggested :&nbsp;1) Setting up a Public Limited Company (Sdn Bhd) to manage the site2) Request transfer of domain ownership &amp; data to their new set up&nbsp;With that Fraudulent Ent willingly steps down and wouldn&#039;t play further part in their quest.&nbsp;A timeline was given to all, much earlier. The expiry and lead time was more than enuff to do a clean transfer...&nbsp;Unfortunately that was not the case, and hence we are all here to have a good read and laugh...:top: &nbsp;In a business point, once a service contract has been terminated even before the end of it, the contractor will not be liable or subject to con&#039;t to fulfill it&#039;s contractial obligation. As the client would&#039;ve known, they would already have their new contractor to do the follow-up...&nbsp;Is the last phrase correct here?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NKTOB, post: 228389, member: 2762"] In this case, FE services was "TERMINATED" even before the yearly contract was up, coz a new service provider was already appointed! What can/shd a "TERMINATED" service provider like FE to render some more? In short.. Fraudulent Ent started out on a voluntarily basis, more for the passion & friendship then anything else. However in a short span, the objectives have deviated from it's core. A newer approach was suggested : 1) Setting up a Public Limited Company (Sdn Bhd) to manage the site 2) Request transfer of domain ownership & data to their new set up With that Fraudulent Ent willingly steps down and wouldn't play further part in their quest. A timeline was given to all, much earlier. The expiry and lead time was more than enuff to do a clean transfer... Unfortunately that was not the case, and hence we are all here to have a good read and laugh...:top: In a business point, once a service contract has been terminated even before the end of it, the contractor will not be liable or subject to con't to fulfill it's contractial obligation. As the client would've known, they would already have their new contractor to do the follow-up... Is the last phrase correct here? [/QUOTE]

Verification