Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Website programming - is this true?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bmwcar" data-source="post: 228365" data-attributes="member: 2286"><p>The thread is diverting from the 2 questions:-</p><p> </p><p>1) should website hoster be keeping back up in case something goes wrong during the transfer? From what has been posted so far, the general consensus seems to be that for customer service - yes, some do in case something goes wrong with the back up. </p><p> </p><p>2) once a site is recovered and back on track - as in my example when the Member Hoster manages to recover and rehost the site, can the recovered data which is being hosted (the website was running) be transfered to another party?</p><p> </p><p>I think the consensus here was that if there was no back up and the data was recovered and managed to be hosted again, then with minimal effort, it should be able to be burnt into a cd and passed to the client or allowed access to redownload again.</p><p> </p><p>Have learnt that </p><p>- good business ethics - give client a cd and make a back up in case the client scr3ws it op. </p><p> </p><p>- Buyer beware ethics - give the client access. he scr3ws it up. No back up cd. Then the hoster then repairs it within 1 day (must not be too difficult if it takes 1 day) and rehosts it, then tells the client sorry, it only works from the member hosters server now.....cannot be transfered any more and makes no effort to rectify the issue....</p><p> </p><p>I know which company's ethics i would prefer dealing with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bmwcar, post: 228365, member: 2286"] The thread is diverting from the 2 questions:- 1) should website hoster be keeping back up in case something goes wrong during the transfer? From what has been posted so far, the general consensus seems to be that for customer service - yes, some do in case something goes wrong with the back up. 2) once a site is recovered and back on track - as in my example when the Member Hoster manages to recover and rehost the site, can the recovered data which is being hosted (the website was running) be transfered to another party? I think the consensus here was that if there was no back up and the data was recovered and managed to be hosted again, then with minimal effort, it should be able to be burnt into a cd and passed to the client or allowed access to redownload again. Have learnt that - good business ethics - give client a cd and make a back up in case the client scr3ws it op. - Buyer beware ethics - give the client access. he scr3ws it up. No back up cd. Then the hoster then repairs it within 1 day (must not be too difficult if it takes 1 day) and rehosts it, then tells the client sorry, it only works from the member hosters server now.....cannot be transfered any more and makes no effort to rectify the issue.... I know which company's ethics i would prefer dealing with. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Website programming - is this true?
Top
Bottom