Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Website programming - is this true?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="popeadrian" data-source="post: 228361" data-attributes="member: 2065"><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">Thats going on the presumption that the new hosting company had erroneously attempted to transfter (ie handover) after the expiry. But even in those circumstances, most hosting companies will allow for a buffer period of approx 3 days to allow CLients (or new hosting companies) to finish the handover process etc. Also, the buffer is usual practice incase the new hosting company cant host it adequately and the client decides to move back tothe original hosting company. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">In bmwcar's question, the presumption is that the platform is the same. WHich means, theoratically, there shouldnt be any major bugs unless the old hosting company had DELIBERATELY undertaken actions (be it actively or by refraining from doing something that it should) that would cause bugs to surface. In this situation, there isnt a "handover" but rather a dectruction of the Clients legitimate property....and thus THEFT. Why THEFT? Because theft is the dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. There is no use in "shooting" the new hosting company....when the old hosting company was unethical. Right? </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">But lets now take the scenario a little further. Lets say that due to the inability of the new hosting company ie Co.HT to transfter the data properly (ie in effect, there's no Handover from the old hoster ie FE) the old hosting company rehosts the website etc pursuant to the original arragement with the Client. This means, that the actual one year hosting service is still in effect. No probs so far, right? But what happens if the hosting company ie FE decides that they want to amend the website/data.... or just for hte fun of it, to take the Clients Website offline. In effect, to stop doing the work for which they have been instructed to do? Now...what does this mean? Hmmm......... Can FE still claim that they have discharged their business duties? Can they claim that they are no longer responsible? Advice please? </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="popeadrian, post: 228361, member: 2065"] [SIZE=2][/SIZE] [SIZE=2]Thats going on the presumption that the new hosting company had erroneously attempted to transfter (ie handover) after the expiry. But even in those circumstances, most hosting companies will allow for a buffer period of approx 3 days to allow CLients (or new hosting companies) to finish the handover process etc. Also, the buffer is usual practice incase the new hosting company cant host it adequately and the client decides to move back tothe original hosting company. [/SIZE] [SIZE=2]In bmwcar's question, the presumption is that the platform is the same. WHich means, theoratically, there shouldnt be any major bugs unless the old hosting company had DELIBERATELY undertaken actions (be it actively or by refraining from doing something that it should) that would cause bugs to surface. In this situation, there isnt a "handover" but rather a dectruction of the Clients legitimate property....and thus THEFT. Why THEFT? Because theft is the dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. There is no use in "shooting" the new hosting company....when the old hosting company was unethical. Right? [/SIZE] [SIZE=2][/SIZE] [SIZE=2]But lets now take the scenario a little further. Lets say that due to the inability of the new hosting company ie Co.HT to transfter the data properly (ie in effect, there's no Handover from the old hoster ie FE) the old hosting company rehosts the website etc pursuant to the original arragement with the Client. This means, that the actual one year hosting service is still in effect. No probs so far, right? But what happens if the hosting company ie FE decides that they want to amend the website/data.... or just for hte fun of it, to take the Clients Website offline. In effect, to stop doing the work for which they have been instructed to do? Now...what does this mean? Hmmm......... Can FE still claim that they have discharged their business duties? Can they claim that they are no longer responsible? Advice please? [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Website programming - is this true?
Top
Bottom
