Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="glock_8" data-source="post: 396932" data-attributes="member: 14626">thank you for ur lengthy explanation...another doubt which i hope u could explain, how would you know that ur engine is happy with ron 95 i.e no knocking hence "there is no timing retard, and so NO LOSS OF POWER, whether the fuel is 98, 97, 95 or 92" our car is well insulated even i cant tell whether the engine is running or not from inside the car.if in this case our so called advance and modern engine detects the slightest knocking in split second and retard the timing...i doubt we will even notice it...so there is still a possibility that ur ron 95 fuelled car running on a retard timing producing a slightly less power which u didnt notice...knowing our na car which is a bitch to even get a decent 3-5hp out of a rm3k bmw performance air filter...wouldnt the rm0.20 saving from using the ron 95 sound silly?plus i read somewhere in the user manual that our car can still use ron 92, but in an emergency situation only...that says something right?.if ron 95 can produce the same result as ron98, why was the manufacturer tested it on 98, wouldnt it be better for them to market thier product based on ron 95...that will reach out to almost every country in the world...wouldnt it?anyways just for argument sake...really is a gd info from our sifu schwepps</blockquote>