Reply to thread

Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form

Message: <blockquote data-quote="toiletroll" data-source="post: 500369" data-attributes="member: 7672">CLARIFICATION:I would like to make some clarification about E90 320i is slower than Polo1.2.  I understand that there are many VWs sales rep have been quoting and showing this thread to their potential customer to convince them that Polo is better than E90.  Let me clarify that in terms of acceleration, Polo 1.2  will take the lead at the beginning, but once the speed hits 80km/h, the E90 will go faster than Polo1.2 and I am sure Polo will never be able to go near to E90.  Potential Polo buyer, please take note that E90 and Polo is 2 different car.  We should compare durian to durian.  You won't take an apple to compare against a D24.  Another example is you won't compare a modified Wira against a Polo.   It is 2 different class.  E90 is a 4 door saloon with 50/50 weight distribution and it is a FR.  Polo is a 4 door mini hatch car without 50/50 weight distribution.  E90 is weights much heavier than a Polo.  More importantly, E90 is a NA compared to Polo which is turbo charged.  In terms of handling and top speed, no way a Polo can come close to E90.  Like I said before, compare durian to durian.  In this case, it is comparing a apple (polo) to durian (E90).BMW is well known as a Ultimate Driving Machine...  since when we hear people comment that Polo is a UDM?  So for VW sales rep, please be ethical in conducting your sales,  don't mislead your potential customers.  Please show this post to your potential Polo customers....  if you are a ethical sales rep...</blockquote>

Verification