Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TorqueTuning" data-source="post: 603000" data-attributes="member: 7155">hi bro,thks for sharing.&nbsp; based on you dynojet 224x figures, i would say it is over compensated as usual for inertia type dyno.&nbsp; getting 173hp as stock value is only 6% loss which is impossible.&nbsp; if using 15% loss, it should reads about 156hp on wheel.&nbsp; the torque figure even more obvious where the loss was only 5Nm.&nbsp; to me, it is more like on engine figure as on wheel.&nbsp; anyway, your before and after DTUK is about 16% improvement for Hp and 26% for torque which is remarkable.&nbsp; by the way which gear you were using?&nbsp; if you want more realistic dyno figures, go for DynoDynamic which is known for &#039;heartbreak dyno&#039; because it measures more accurately on wheel with retarded system.&nbsp; buy usually people don&#039;t like to see the &#039;low value&#039; from DynoDynamic <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="TorqueTuning, post: 603000, member: 7155"] hi bro, thks for sharing. based on you dynojet 224x figures, i would say it is over compensated as usual for inertia type dyno. getting 173hp as stock value is only 6% loss which is impossible. if using 15% loss, it should reads about 156hp on wheel. the torque figure even more obvious where the loss was only 5Nm. to me, it is more like on engine figure as on wheel. anyway, your before and after DTUK is about 16% improvement for Hp and 26% for torque which is remarkable. by the way which gear you were using? if you want more realistic dyno figures, go for DynoDynamic which is known for 'heartbreak dyno' because it measures more accurately on wheel with retarded system. buy usually people don't like to see the 'low value' from DynoDynamic :-) [/QUOTE]

Verification