Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
The BMW Range
5 Series
F10, F11, F07
F10 520i vs 520d
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Russell" data-source="post: 630862" data-attributes="member: 28407"><p>Getting back on topic, I was struggling for a while to decide between the i and the d. Even to the extent that I went to test drive both cars twice. I ended up buying the i for the following reasons:-</p><p></p><p>- I still can't get over the narrow rev band of the d. To me when I rev a car hard to pick up, I need the vicarious feel of the engine revving to "high heavens" so to say. The i with the wider rev band allows for that but the d will to run out of rev a lot quicker due to the narrow rev band. To me, it kinda takes the wind out of my sail so to say. It's a personal thing and may not be true for everyone</p><p></p><p>- Though I usually drive my car hard there are also times when I just want to cruise. And during those moments, the i becomes a much better proposition for me. The d, although does come with pretty decent insulation to prevent too much vibration and engine noise from intruding into the cabin, still allows a bit too much for comfort in my opinion</p><p></p><p>- In the narrow parking lots of KL, the active steering on the i is really a treat for me. It makes what is a big car feel nimble and very maneuverable in tight spots. The active steering only comes with the i</p><p></p><p>Overall, I'm pretty happy with the car after a few weeks of owning it. Having come from owning the previous gen S6 engines, I was initially worried that I would struggle with the new 4-potters. I have been pleasantly surprised by it I must say. In the day to day driving, it is so easy to forget that it is a 4-potter. I will venture to say that the 4-potter engine is almost as smooth as the S6, especially when you're cruising with light accelerations. It is when I floor the car that I miss the growl of the S6.</p><p></p><p>On a side note, though I am not one for brand bashing, I have to say that the new 4-potter on the Beemer is a lot more refined than the same on the Mercs. Having driven a friend's E250 quite extensively, I now realised how rough the Merc's 4-potter can sound, especially when driving hard. It turns what is otherwise a pretty comfortable car into a rough sounding machine. The 520 in comparison sounds a lot more refined in the same situation. This is ironic given that an engine generation ago when both brands were still on 6-potters, one S6 and one V6, it was the Merc that boasts of having a more refined and quieter engine!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Russell, post: 630862, member: 28407"] Getting back on topic, I was struggling for a while to decide between the i and the d. Even to the extent that I went to test drive both cars twice. I ended up buying the i for the following reasons:- - I still can't get over the narrow rev band of the d. To me when I rev a car hard to pick up, I need the vicarious feel of the engine revving to "high heavens" so to say. The i with the wider rev band allows for that but the d will to run out of rev a lot quicker due to the narrow rev band. To me, it kinda takes the wind out of my sail so to say. It's a personal thing and may not be true for everyone - Though I usually drive my car hard there are also times when I just want to cruise. And during those moments, the i becomes a much better proposition for me. The d, although does come with pretty decent insulation to prevent too much vibration and engine noise from intruding into the cabin, still allows a bit too much for comfort in my opinion - In the narrow parking lots of KL, the active steering on the i is really a treat for me. It makes what is a big car feel nimble and very maneuverable in tight spots. The active steering only comes with the i Overall, I'm pretty happy with the car after a few weeks of owning it. Having come from owning the previous gen S6 engines, I was initially worried that I would struggle with the new 4-potters. I have been pleasantly surprised by it I must say. In the day to day driving, it is so easy to forget that it is a 4-potter. I will venture to say that the 4-potter engine is almost as smooth as the S6, especially when you're cruising with light accelerations. It is when I floor the car that I miss the growl of the S6. On a side note, though I am not one for brand bashing, I have to say that the new 4-potter on the Beemer is a lot more refined than the same on the Mercs. Having driven a friend's E250 quite extensively, I now realised how rough the Merc's 4-potter can sound, especially when driving hard. It turns what is otherwise a pretty comfortable car into a rough sounding machine. The 520 in comparison sounds a lot more refined in the same situation. This is ironic given that an engine generation ago when both brands were still on 6-potters, one S6 and one V6, it was the Merc that boasts of having a more refined and quieter engine! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The BMW Range
5 Series
F10, F11, F07
F10 520i vs 520d
Top
Bottom