Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pussy" data-source="post: 198993" data-attributes="member: 60">hi Geofferylee,i beg to differ that the M50 non-vanos is not powerful..where did you do your findings ?if my non-vanos engine can't be ovetaken by a e46 325M54 car at 240km/h.. then why is this engine is equalavant to a CRAP waja 1.8L..even a 36 M50B25TU can tail-gate me..fuel cumsumption ? mine gave me a 450kms to a 50L fill up..did you know that the non-vanos engine is much-much better than a vanos when it's in a manual mode...does a non-vanos and a vanos power or torque that you are refering to of a difference of 30% ? please correct that statement.. the power is the same, the non-vanos engine is much aggresive, powerful and higher cams..in-fact, they have the USS50 cams inside., the vanos uses a lower cam..since you have yet to puchase your car since january, i suggest that you buy one e36 M50B25TU and drive it...then u will know how a M50 engines works..no-offence, but this my two cents to correct your statement, others might take your statements seriously and getting mislaid..regards.peace.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>