Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
The BMW Range
3 Series
E90, E91, E92, E93
BMW 325i vs Merc C250 CGI vs Audi A4 2.0TFSI Quattro vs Volkswagen Passat CC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lewint" data-source="post: 466105" data-attributes="member: 16863"><p>oh sorry about that. my mistake. haha. </p><p></p><p>hmm call me old school but i still believe somewhat that there is no replacement for displacement. no doubt the C250 CGI is a fine machine with ample power. but it is still a 1.8 liter 4 cylinder engine with a clanky sound both at start-up and during normal driving conditions. relatively smooth no doubt, but not refined. </p><p></p><p>also, the turbo lag is very evident. when you step on it, the car will inch forward a little and then a sensational rush of power will come on. this is true for both the C200 and C250 CGI. the CGI line is in serious need of a bi turbo. like bmw's twin scroll and VW's twincharger. if u have been driving an NA car, you will have to adjust your throttling or you will find it jerky and uncomfortable.</p><p></p><p>in the absence of the C300, i would take the C250 CGI over anything else currently in its market segment. but with a V6 engine and the extra goodies it comes with, the C300 moves to the top of the list. </p><p></p><p>once you have driven a 6 potter, i think its hard to go back to a 4 potter la. the "feel" is no longer there. haha.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lewint, post: 466105, member: 16863"] oh sorry about that. my mistake. haha. hmm call me old school but i still believe somewhat that there is no replacement for displacement. no doubt the C250 CGI is a fine machine with ample power. but it is still a 1.8 liter 4 cylinder engine with a clanky sound both at start-up and during normal driving conditions. relatively smooth no doubt, but not refined. also, the turbo lag is very evident. when you step on it, the car will inch forward a little and then a sensational rush of power will come on. this is true for both the C200 and C250 CGI. the CGI line is in serious need of a bi turbo. like bmw's twin scroll and VW's twincharger. if u have been driving an NA car, you will have to adjust your throttling or you will find it jerky and uncomfortable. in the absence of the C300, i would take the C250 CGI over anything else currently in its market segment. but with a V6 engine and the extra goodies it comes with, the C300 moves to the top of the list. once you have driven a 6 potter, i think its hard to go back to a 4 potter la. the "feel" is no longer there. haha. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The BMW Range
3 Series
E90, E91, E92, E93
BMW 325i vs Merc C250 CGI vs Audi A4 2.0TFSI Quattro vs Volkswagen Passat CC
Top
Bottom