Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
Site Options
Site Enquiries, Comments and Suggestions
A good initiative by the CMs on ensuring that members are not taken advantage Part II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wingzee" data-source="post: 667832" data-attributes="member: 22730"><p>On the topic of dictatorship, come to think of it, it's odd that why the onus is on me to provide proof when Herbert did not even provide his basis of allegations. Where is the proof that I am profiteering in the first place? Just because he managed to find some supplier selling it cheaper? Just like any other law proceedings, proofs & motives must first be established.</p><p></p><p>Just a thought.</p><p></p><p>And of course, the various questions that was posed yesterday. They have to be addressed and upon discussions by CMs, have to be announced for the benefit of all. Or else, it looks like an obvious personal attack or selective prosecution.</p><p></p><p>What gonna happen to this thread? <a href="http://www.bmwclubmalaysia.com/forums/showthread.php?52615-wts-bmw-140-scanner-and-k-dcan-usb-interface" target="_blank">http://www.bmwclubmalaysia.com/forums/showthread.php?52615-wts-bmw-140-scanner-and-k-dcan-usb-interface</a></p><p></p><p>Why is seller not questioned at the same time? My case have obviously set the precedence of price policing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wingzee, post: 667832, member: 22730"] On the topic of dictatorship, come to think of it, it's odd that why the onus is on me to provide proof when Herbert did not even provide his basis of allegations. Where is the proof that I am profiteering in the first place? Just because he managed to find some supplier selling it cheaper? Just like any other law proceedings, proofs & motives must first be established. Just a thought. And of course, the various questions that was posed yesterday. They have to be addressed and upon discussions by CMs, have to be announced for the benefit of all. Or else, it looks like an obvious personal attack or selective prosecution. What gonna happen to this thread? [url]http://www.bmwclubmalaysia.com/forums/showthread.php?52615-wts-bmw-140-scanner-and-k-dcan-usb-interface[/url] Why is seller not questioned at the same time? My case have obviously set the precedence of price policing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Site Options
Site Enquiries, Comments and Suggestions
A good initiative by the CMs on ensuring that members are not taken advantage Part II
Top
Bottom
