Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
Site Options
Site Enquiries, Comments and Suggestions
A good initiative by the CMs on ensuring that members are not taken advantage Part II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="t2ribena" data-source="post: 667779" data-attributes="member: 3847"><p>i think this is a joke reply...what positive thinking and good faith been said here?</p><p></p><p>an OM selling thread was publicly scrutinized just because he is suspected of profiteering. How can you justify such action without proof in the first place? is it a joke now that positive thinking and good faith is repeated here? was there positive thinking and was there good faith exercised here in the first place? further to that now the he has been publicly ask to provide prove...to further pursue this action in the first place was not done in good faith at all. </p><p></p><p>So like i said and some others had put forth...all that is clarified here is just mere lip service and sop reply as usual...save the day? pls la...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="t2ribena, post: 667779, member: 3847"] i think this is a joke reply...what positive thinking and good faith been said here? an OM selling thread was publicly scrutinized just because he is suspected of profiteering. How can you justify such action without proof in the first place? is it a joke now that positive thinking and good faith is repeated here? was there positive thinking and was there good faith exercised here in the first place? further to that now the he has been publicly ask to provide prove...to further pursue this action in the first place was not done in good faith at all. So like i said and some others had put forth...all that is clarified here is just mere lip service and sop reply as usual...save the day? pls la... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Site Options
Site Enquiries, Comments and Suggestions
A good initiative by the CMs on ensuring that members are not taken advantage Part II
Top
Bottom